Sunday, July 8, 2012

Is journalism an illusion?


Euro is going to crash, the Greeks are going to sink Europe, world is coming to an end.

Media has been screaming for a disaster for years now. Euro has been predicted to fall and crash, and take every euro-zone country with it (and maybe even the rest of the world). However euro is still much stronger than dollar or the British pound. Yes, it has come down from its highest – 1.46 against a dollar, now 1.22 – but it still hasn’t sunk completely.

Greece is in great trouble, same with Spain, Ireland and Portugal. Italy is to follow, and number of other countries. Unless we do something dramatic, we are all going to die.

This is pretty much the message that media is sending out. Well, they are only repeating what policymakers or specialists are saying. Maybe so, but media decides how to title, how to quote and how to analyze. Yet it seems everyone is just repeating everyone – media is going around in circles, because nobody dares to claim something different.

I’m part of media. Journalism has been my passion as long as I can remember, but I’m starting to question whether newspapers, magazines, online editions etc. actually know why they were originally founded.

Wikipedia describes journalism as “investigation and reporting of events, issues and trends to broad audiences”. Investigation. That’s the key word. Not only reporting, but investigating. Analyzing. Explaining. Not only telling people what is going on but letting them know why and how. And repeating what some economist or politician has said about why and how is not it!

I’m starting to wonder whether I am only part of the problem myself. Does journalism even exist? Or is journalism, at the end, only entertainment? Maybe it’s impossible to be completely objective. Maybe it’s impossible not to have an agenda. Maybe I’m naive thinking journalism could make a difference – a difference that is not driven by selfish agenda, but by the good of the people, truth and justice.

Or maybe I’m just used to having things quite well. Finnish freedom of the press and freedom of speech is often praised around the world. This is sadly only half the truth; yes we have free press, but what do we do with our freedom? We follow the cycle. We repeat the same things over and over again. Read one newspaper and you have read them all.

Finnish journalists don’t specialize. They don’t investigate (checking Wikipedia does not count. And yes I know I used Wikipedia myself for this post). They don’t analyze, because they do not have the abilities or knowledge to do so. In United States, for example, a journalist can be so professional in his field that is often asked to speak as an expert on the issue. That would never happen in Finland – at least not with my generation of journalists.

I worry for the quality of Finnish journalism. Finnish press has never been as free as now, yet it has never been as disappointing. Nothing I read in the paper can surprise me anymore. It’s all the same.

Please don’t take this as criticism for single journalists. Please take this as criticism for media corporations, for the system as a whole.

- People may expect too much of journalism. Not only do they expect it to be entertaining, they expect it to be true.
Lewis H. Lapham